What is happening in the world when third graders are plotting to kill their teacher. My day started with reading a news article on Fox News about “Special Education” children plotting to kill their teacher. Apparently they brought a broken knife, hand cuffs, and duct tape to school to get the job done. Damn, those Georgia kids are rough!
It’s bad enough for something like this to happen, but why do we have to point out that the children are “special education” children. What does that have to do with anything? Does that make the plot especially interesting? Does that make what they did expected? Does it make what they did so outrageous that we should not let those “special” kids in our regular schools???
Yes, I am sort of upset after reading the article. According to Fox News ~ “The alleged target is a veteran educator who teaches third-grade students with a range of learning disabilities, including attention deficit disorder, delayed development and hyperactivity, friends and parents said.” So, again, why is that important to know? Are we saying that “normal” or “regular” third graders would never had done something so heinous? It’s those damn hyperactive kids causing the trouble. They should be banned!! After all, why should all the “normal” kids have to be subjected to their antics! They are obviously a bad influence on the “regular” kids.
WHATEVER!!! What I find quite disturbing is that any third graders would come up with something like this. I would have to say that the young girl who hatched the plot as revenge (according to the article ~ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,344369,00.html) apparently has some issues to resolve, but she could have been any number of kids. Not just one of those special education kids.
The same thing happened last December with the Omaha, NE mall shooting. As more and more details came out about that boy (teenager) it was discovered that he had ADHD and did not have a great family upbringing. Why again do we need to point out that he had ADHD. It certainly doesn’t change what happened. The grieving families aren’t going to be impacted one way or the other by the news. I cringed then as I heard news accounts about the “monster” with ADHD.
I believe that we need to be very careful when labeling people. Yes this kid had ADHD, but he also had brown eyes & brown hair and he worked at a McDonald’s. Again, doesn’t have anything to do with the crime he committed. Isn’t going to bring back any of the 9 people he killed. And not all of the sensationalist killers of the recent past have had ADHD.
I think that there is something more neurologically off balance with people who plot or carry out these sensationalist crimes. There is something off with the way they are thinking. And the third grader, how can we even expect to believe that this child knew what she was doing? She is in third grade. I can’t remember third grade myself, but I have a forth grader, and I know that there is some reality that she just hasn’t gotten yet.
More and more news outlets are digging for dirt to bring the “news” to the rest of the world. Personally, I think the 1950’s approach of not telling the whole truth was much better for society. Giving people more information than is truly necessary doesn’t accomplish anything positive. It certainly doesn’t change anything either….or does it….maybe it does after all…….maybe it just might change people’s attitudes….